Overused Words; the plight of the descriptive adjective Vlad Kahn Application
Jun 04

Just so you know, Lucas seems to have recovered from his little accident last night. He’s got a little crusty scab just above his hairline, but otherwise seems okay.

And, when read in context of the post it was commented in (by Sarah Etc.) the following comment makes perfect sense. But when considered out of context, it seems a little bit deflating:

I think you’re conspicuously missing “fantastic.”

Context is good, yes it is.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Egret Island on June 30th, 2008

The Weekend Sloughed by with a Wheeze and a Groan on June 9th, 2008

Tower Dogs on July 21st, 2008

What it means to be "Uncontacted" on May 30th, 2008

Vertical Infinity on June 11th, 2008

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags:

4 Responses to “etc.”

  1. Sarah, etc. Says:

    Deflation was so not the intention! Just wanted to climb on your hyperbole wagon, you know? I use “fantastic” all the time as a synonym for “great” and every time I think, “This is great! But not at all having anything to do with fantasy, in any sense of the word.”

    Glad your little one is well.

  2. Sarah, etc. Says:

    …aaaaand I conspicuously missed the point! Must remember to, in the future, ruminate more prior to commenting.

  3. Matt Mitchell Says:

    @Sarah, etc.: I know you didn’t mean it that way. I just thought it was funny when read out of context. I’m always on the lookout for funny :-)

  4. Steve Buchheit Says:

    Glad Lucas is okay. That’s why kids are made out of rubber.

Leave a Reply