May 15

Dear Microsoft,

I hate you and I hate your big ugly head and I hate Windows and I hate Vista and you can shut up.

Sincerely,

Matt Mitchell

P.S. Cram it.

FYI: Vista actually takes longer to load than any Windows product ever. No matter how fast processors get, Microsoft always manages to find a way to dumb the speeds down with excessive code. And once again Vista has spontaneously deleted a document I was working on right off the hard drive. I had a backup copy this time (and a printed version, actually, but that’s a rare case) but this could easily have been the only one. This is the third or fourth time this has happened, and I’m in the process of d-loading OpenOffice right now. I’ve used it before and didn’t like it (like, ten years ago) but if it works and doesn’t delete my work irretrievably, then I’m switching. And I’m thinking really hard about either switching back to XP or just switching to another platform altogether. I’m so sick of Microsoft as a whole. The whole GDFAM (just consider that an expletive of ginormous proportion) company, from the CEO down to the creepy little lady that cleans the toilets.

P.S.S. Microsoft:

Suck it!

If you liked that post, then try these...

Geek Squad, Part II on November 13th, 2007

My Workstation on November 27th, 2007

Geek Squad on November 12th, 2007

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

May 15

Two things I find very interesting this morning. First, the Neptune Society, from Matt Staggs:

A Florida company is offering a unique memorial service for your earthly remains. For a fee, the people at the Neptune Society will mix your cremated remains with concrete, which is then molded into a sculpture and placed with others in a giant artificial reef a little over a mile off the coast of Key Biscayne, Florida. The reef then provides a new habitat for marine life and a destination for recreational divers and researchers. It’s apparently all ecologically sound, too. At first blush, I really like this idea. I’m certain that I want my remains cremated, and as much as I love the ocean this would be a perfect way to rest for eternity.

Also of interest today, from Curtis Palmer: Birmingham is gaining a new 1100 acre park in the Oxmoor/Ishkooda area. The park is bigger than New York’s Central Park and is going to have tons of amenities–hiking trails, 20 acre lake, softball and soccer fields, etc. I live in Montevallo, but I work in Birmingham, so this new park will be good for day trips. Oak Mountain State Park is closer and I’ve always loved it (it’s a refuge in an urban area, almost 10,000 acres). I go there often, but I love me a new park, yes I do. Especially interesting in this is that this park will make Birmingham the #1 U.S. city in terms of greenspace per capita. Birmingham catches a lot of grief around the country and is regularly noted as one of the worst places to live in America, so it’s nice to see the “Magic City” making inroads to be something better than it is. If only we could somehow craft a governing body that wasn’t corrupt and driving the city to bankruptcy.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Great Places To Live on May 1st, 2006

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

May 15

Instructables has a new how-to guide to building your own Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy in real life. As you know, the HHGTTG is one of my favorite SciFi gadgets of all time, so I’m definitely down with this idea. In their guide, they use an old handheld PC (a Psion 5mx) running on Linux and dump a static copy of Wikipedia into it. Now, I happen to have an old HP Jornada 680 (in a box in the attic) and I’m thinking about giving this a try. I’ve been ruminating on uses for this obsolete gadget for a couple of years now. But then I remembered I have a Palm T|X and a 2GB SD card, so I copied Wikipedia (168MB) and put it there. Now I have my own H2G2 in my pocket, to tell me anything (mostly accurate) that I need to know. All I need is a “Don’t Panic” sticker and I’m set.

Via io9.

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , ,

May 14

Volcano in Chile, Earthquake in China, Cyclone in Myanmar. Holy crap, folks, the End Days are upon us.

Edit: Steve reminds me that this has been the most active tornado season in decades. Something I should have remembered, since I live just down the road from tornado alley, and happen to work in an industry that responds to tornado path damage recovery. Oh well. I never said I was smart.

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/05An7es5M9d17/610x.jpg

If you liked that post, then try these...

I Am Legend on December 23rd, 2007

The Internet is not working on December 3rd, 2007

Neil Nielson Patrick Harris Hayden on April 15th, 2008

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , ,

May 14

Queries suck. At least writing them does. The entire novel-writing process has never made me feel so futile as penning these two vexing paragraphs. I could fill this page with links to query-writing suggestions and formats and information I’ve read from various outlets all over the web, all of it very helpful in its own context, but essentially worthless in applying to my own book. Why am I re-confronting my greatest fear? Because la Gringa wants to know where all the adult fiction subs are. And I have one. And I want to send it to her. I fear her rejection, yes, but this is more than some short story that I’ve labored over for a week and a half. This manuscript represents five years of my collective creative output. It represents potential success in publishing. It represents the hopes and dreams of a writer who wants to be. It represents potential for disposable income. I’ve been well aware of la Gringa’s advent into the agenting business, and I’ve had my manuscript ready for a good while now, I just don’t have the query letter right yet. If my book represents five years of creative output, this query letter represents another six months at least. No, it’s not all I’ve been working on, but I return to it regularly, and I suffer for its potential. I tweak it, and then I scrap it and start over, and then I agonize for a little while before I toil some more. But to dedicate so much time to something that can be the realization of all the dreams of a lifetime of writing is so daunting to me that I convince myself that the query must be better than the story itself, that my story depends on this little 100-word document to be successful, that if the story doesn’t get published it will be because I didn’t write the query letter well enough. And the worst of it is that great bit of advice I keep pinned to the wall by my desk:

…the writer never gets any better than the writing you see in the pitch letter.

Ack! Such pressure! To prove I’m worthy, that my story doesn’t suck, that I’m…well, you know how it is, don’t you, Mr. Query Letter. And I’ll bet you’re the most successful and wonderful story pitch there ever was–You. Sick. Bastard. You’re enjoying my pain, aren’t you? You see this blog and you look at me and think, “Heh, he’s in the gutter now!” Well, I’m done eating your scraps, Mr. Query. I’m jumping off this bus and catching a…a train. Or a hang glider.

Or a noose.

Oh, well. On to ver. 15.9…

If you liked that post, then try these...

Publication on June 1st, 2007

The Novella Format on January 16th, 2008

Thinking about publishing online... on December 19th, 2007

Mount Zion Review: R.I.P. on February 21st, 2008

The Book on December 12th, 2007

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , ,

May 09

I’ve always had good eyesight. 20/15 when I was young, 20/20 when I got out of the Navy in ‘93. When I was 14 years old my family took a vacation to the Gulf of Mexico and I got to ride with my sisters in the back of a truck which was covered with a camper shell. When we arrived in Florida, my eyes were tearing up a lot and burning, and I couldn’t bear the sunlight. My sisters were fine, but as it turns out I guess I was sitting in a bad place in the truck and got carbon monoxide poisoning, which basically gave my eyeballs a nice chemical bath. It didn’t affect my vision, but I became extremely light sensitive, and before I could enjoy the first moment out of doors on that vacation my mom had to run to the store and buy me a pair of sunglasses. I’d never worn sunglasses before, and the pair she dutifully picked out for me were, let’s say, less than stylish. But fortunately I was at the beach, a place I’ve always loved, and my socially awkward initial reaction waned once I was running about in the waves. Since then, I’ve always worn sunglasses, much to the chagrin of some old-school type folks who think I’m “gettin all Hollywood,” or, translated, they think I wear them because of some sense of vanity. I do like them, sure, but I’ve forgotten my good ones before (when I left the house in the rain or at night) and had to rush out and buy an el-cheapo pair just to get by. Usually by the time I’m at the store to buy them I already have a migraine and I’ve driven the whole way squinting as much as possible with my hand shielding my eyes from sunlight.

My light sensitivity is something that’s never been really a problem. I take care of my shades and I generally keep them with me at all times. Even if I have to pull a late-night shift, I’ll take my shades just in case something happens and I’m out after the sun comes up. But lately I’ve been having other problems with my eyes. I’m getting a lot of little floaties and having a little trouble reading a digital clock or the DTV menu on my television, which is a 45″ flatscreen LCD, big enough, you would suspect, to have a menu I could read. And now, the mia culpa: two weeks ago I took, and passed, the test for my Alabama boating license. I went to get my driver’s license updated, and found out I had to pass a visual exam first. There was one of those boxes with the viewer fitted on top of it, which I had to look through and then decipher a line of incredibly small text. And really all I saw were little specks of fuzz. (This next part should make you feel really great about driving the highways of Alabama.)

The examiner said, “Read the text.”

I said, “Uh, okay. V?”

“Right.”

Now emboldened a bit, I said, “D.”

“Try again.”

“G?”

He shook his head. I pulled my head back and blinked several times, trying to focus. I can do this, I thought. I put my head back to the viewer. “C.”

“Correct. Next?”

It went on like this for the next few minutes, with me sweating, terrified I was about to lose my license, basically guessing my way through the entire test. I remember the only letter I could distinctly read–and even it was a little bit blurry–was the V. Everything else was just a fuzzy speck that could have been anything. On the last letter I think I must have guessed six times before I finally got it right, and without a word the examiner went to creating my new license. But me, I was scared.

Four years ago my vision was tested 20/25, not great, but not too bad. So I set up an appointment for today to get my eyes examined and the doctor gave me that terrible diagnosis: “You’re near-sighted.”

Gulp. “What’s my vision?”

“Corrected?” she asked.

“Just regular.”

She looked at her chart. “20/40.”

And I thought, My God. So fast.

Now I know that this isn’t really a big deal. My wife has had glasses since she was in 3rd grade, and hers are really strong. But from my perspective, a guy who’s always had perfect vision, the realization of what is happening isn’t just about my eyesight getting worse, it’s about my mortality, it’s a reminder that I’ve only got so long in this life, and then it’s done. And I’ve got two little boys who, had I followed a more natural path, would be sixteen or eighteen years old now, but instead they’re 1 and 3, and I’m 39, and feeling old.

I picked out a set of frames that my wife agreed with, made by my old reliable Oakley brand, and after a few hours went to pick up my new glasses. And suddenly the world was clear. It’s amazing. I didn’t even know I had that much of a problem, but when I put the glasses on it was like one of those Claritin commercials, where everything is fuzzy at the beginning and then a layer is peeled away and becomes defined. I realized I had been living in a high-definition world with analog equipment.

I’m fine with anything up close. I can still read and work on the computer without glasses, and I can see well enough at a distance, but I’m wondering now why I would want to. I spent the rest of the afternoon looking at the leaves on trees, looking at the early-rising moon, realizing a level of depth and clarity I can’t remember ever having before. So here’s Me2.0, wondering at the new world of high def around me.

Matt 2.0

If you liked that post, then try these...

Habitat for Humanity on October 7th, 2005

Don't Stop Believing on January 23rd, 2008

Ode to a Bud on February 5th, 2008

Excitable on October 12th, 2005

Luna Moth on November 28th, 2007

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , , ,

May 08

John Scalzi asks the question: Who would win in a knife fight, Smurfs or Carebears?

In the thread, the public is in overwhelming support of Smurfs, but I (of course) unabashedly disagree. My comment:

Everyone seems to be leaning Smurfs, which naturally makes me lean CBs (Always bet against the public. See: Superbowl XLII). And besides, I think the bears have a chance. I mean, they’re bears. Have you ever seen a CB open its mouth? No? That is probably because of the jagged rows of teeth it needs to hide (it hides them because of its job, which is to remain endearing to children. Can’t do that with all those nasty teeth on display). A mouth which, as luck would have it, could probably chew four or five Smurfs at a time (if the CB in question didn’t just swallow them whole). And don’t forget the clawless paws are only clawless because the claws are retractable.

You say the Smurfs have superiority in numbers? I say that’s just more blue meat to eat. Care Bears all the way. It’d be like throwing Smurfs in a pen full of rabid wolverines.

Evil Care Bears

Evil Care Bears found on Deviant Art.

Also: My tags for this entry are “Care Bears, John Scalzi, and Smurfs.” So if anyone was to happen to Google “John Scalzi + Care Bears (or Smurfs) (or both)” will probably find their way here. Heh.

I just added the tag “evil” on the off chance that someone might Google “Evil John Scalzi Care Bear.” Double heh.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Titan on April 23rd, 2008

DoDoDon't on April 1st, 2008

Wanted: Viva the Beaver on March 8th, 2006

Sven on February 1st, 2008

I Found Jesus on October 18th, 2005

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , ,

May 08

Tuesday’s post was the first one I’ve ever had a Digg or StumbleUpon go wild. After chugging along for a while collecting between 100 and 300 unique visitors a day, Wednesday’s tally was near 10,000, and today is already up near 5,000. Those are huge numbers for this blog, easily records. It’s interesting, to me, because I’ve Dugg and Stumbled posts a few other times but never really got that much interest. Of course, it’s entirely possible that those posts just didn’t pique the ‘net public’s interest like this one did.

I got the idea for the post in question because I was thinking about cool science fiction gadgets, and couldn’t find a “greatest of” list on the web anywhere. There were tons of lists, of course; best spaceships, best scifi kitchen gadgets, best weapons, etc.; but never a list of the best SciFi gadgets. So I did one. Some agreed with it, and some hated it: as per the norm. The Stumble reviews were half and half good and bad. I’m okay with that, too, because most of the dissenters didn’t really understand the basic premise of the list: that it wasn’t populated with weapons or spaceships, that it was just gadgets. Some took exception to the fact that I only used gadgets from a few books and movies, or that I didn’t include some of the more obscure gadgets from other, older books. I was lambasted on one account for not having included any PK Dick gadgets, but again, I just shrug. It was my list. If they don’t like it or disagree with it, they can make their own list. I’m not saying that to be crude, I’m just saying the way it is. I’m fine with their disagreement. Perfectly. The only bad review that kind of hit me in the chin was one saying that it was “Terribly written and terrible chosen.” No further info, just those five words (miswording theirs).

I wonder if anyone who liked the post will add my feed to their reader, or if they’ll otherwise become regular readers. Time will tell.

Now I’ve got to go pick up my kids from daycare because a serious thunderstorm is rumbling nearby.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Writer's Web on February 7th, 2008

Blog Fiction on March 11th, 2008

Uberblogs and Uberbloggers: Overkill? on November 7th, 2007

Unabashed: Second Life on February 20th, 2008

Steampunk and Steampunkin; Cherie Priest; GUD on November 8th, 2007

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , ,

May 06

What makes science fiction great? Yes, the story, and yes, the characters, but don’t forget all those nifty gadgets! Equipped with this list of goodies, you could go anywhere, create anything, know everything, have a faithful, useful friend, and look really cool the whole time. These are the items that represent SciFi’s greatest imaginings: 

Lightsaber
Star Wars, by George Lucas

It’s a weapon at heart, but so versatile that it is infused with gadgety cool–use it as a flashlight, to melt through metal doors, to slice open large meat carcasses, and it’ll probably slice fresh bread into instant toast (as seen in the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, using a much smaller version of the tool). With an extremely rare Adegan crystal in its core, and being crafted in a month-long rite by a Jedi Knight, the lightsaber is the ultimate tool of the ultimate philosopher/warrior society. Nostalgia is one reason this futuristic gadget is so cool: the idea was obviously borrowed from feudal Japan’s Shogun warriors and their attachment to their carefully crafted artisan swords.

See also: Crysknife from Dune; Ultimate Nullifier from Marvel Comics

Jedi Knight, lightsaber

Stillsuit
Dune, by Frank Herbert

Quoting the book from Wikipedia:

It’s basically a micro-sandwich — a high-efficiency filter and heat-exchange system. The skin-contact layer’s porous. Perspiration passes through it, having cooled the body … near-normal evaporation process. The next two layers . . . include heat exchange filaments and salt precipitators. Salt’s reclaimed. Motions of the body, especially breathing and some osmotic action provide the pumping force. Reclaimed water circulates to catchpockets from which you draw it through this tube in the clip at your neck… Urine and feces are processed in the thigh pads. In the open desert, you wear this filter across your face, this tube in the nostrils with these plugs to ensure a tight fit. Breathe in through the mouth filter, out through the nose tube. With a Fremen suit in good working order, you won’t lose more than a thimbleful of moisture a day…

R2-D2
Star Wars, by George Lucas

You can have Threepio, you can even take HAL; I’ll take Artoo. This little robot can do almost anything from underway spaceship repair to serving drinks. He takes the AI concept to a whole new level, with built-in courage, humor, fear and devotion.

See also: HAL from 2001: A Space Odyssey

Holtzman Shield
Dune, by Frank Herbert

The Holtzman Shield is a potent literary device: it makes directed-energy weaponry impossible against any worthwhile opponent, and also proves traditional projectile-based firearms and missiles ineffective, adding to the feudal atmosphere, and enforces the usage of mêlée weaponry despite other more advanced technology.

Cornucopia Machine
Singularity Sky/Iron Sunrise, by Charlie Stross

The Cornucopia can be programmed with the atomic structure of virtually any item (including another Cornucopia Machine) and, so long as it has fuel, material and time, fabricate it. (I would ask it to make everything on this list.) This is the only item on the list that hasn’t been adapted (yet) into a movie or television program; if you haven’t read these two books yet, I highly recommend them.

See also: Nutrimatic Dispenser from The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy; Food Replicator from Star Trek

Transporter
Star Trek, by Gene Roddenberry

The Transporter was so powerful you could almost call it the deus ex machina of Star Trek, but you can’t, because it wasn’t spontaneous; it was there from the beginning. Still, though; how many times have Trek characters escaped imminent doom by uttering the phrase: “Beam us up”? There are many incarnations of teleportation devices, but none done so well as Star Trek’s Transporter. It was in almost constant use in every movie and throughout every television series, making it one of the most useful gadgets on this list.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams

Complete with it’s Don’t Panic! mantra, this wholly remarkable “book” can tell you anything you want to know about anything in the universe. The Guide was an electronic guidebook which was connected to the galaxy-wide Sub-Etha network for updates. The book was published in 1978, making the Sub-Etha one of the first imaginings of what the Internet could be. 

Iron Man’s Armor
Marvel Comics, by Stan Lee

Super strength, supersonic flight, repulsors, missiles, and pimped out with a red and gold titanium alloy…Nothing is cooler.

See also: KITT, from the 80s TV show Knight Rider

Iron Man Movie

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

May 06

Marvel has better super heroes than DC: Fact. And, even though DC has reigned in the movie adaptation biz up until recently, the shift over to Marvel has begun, and get ready, because it looks like Marvel’s in it for the long haul and are ready to expound upon the statement made initially by Spider Man and now by Iron Man.

Between mecha-fighter Iron Man’s second movie, coming in April 30, 2010, and military-sponsored super-soldier Captain America, coming May 6, 2011, Marvel Comics’ upcoming movie slate has a very militaristic feel. But where’s the peaceful shrinking scientist Ant-Man, who communicates with ants? Apprently his movie’s on hold, so we can get Norse god Thor’s movie, directed by Matthew Vaughn (Stardust, Layer Cake), on June 4, 2010. Captain America’s full title will be The First Avenger: Captain America, and his film will be followed by The Avengers in July 2011.

I’m glad they’re redoing the Hulk, but if they really want to fix past failures they need to look seriously at Daredevil. Or Ghost Rider. In fact, let’s just go ahead and ban Nick Cage and Ben Affleck from any and all future super hero movies. For the genre, I think Robert Downey, Jr. and Ed Norton are exactly the kinds of actors needed to fill the roles. Though I thought Eric Bana did an okay job as Bruce Banner, he just wasn’t right for the role. Ed Norton looks like I might imagine Banner looking like, so, casting is at least better in this adaptation than in the first Hulk. And casting is monumentally important in super hero movies. Just plugging in any-ol’ star won’t work with us fanboys. The actor must fit the role. Like Robert Downey, Jr. in Iron Man. If they’d given that role, as was originally planned, to Nick Cage, or even worse, Ben Affleck, even if nothing else in the movie had changed it wouldn’t have been as good.

For Thor and Captain America, casting is going to be equally important. We–I’m speaking for Fanboy Nation here–don’t care so much about the big names, we just want to see the character fulfilled. We want the actor to fit the role.

The forming of Marvel Studios should help make comic movies a lot better. They should be more focused on presenting the characters faithfully to the storylines already established. Or at least I hope they will. And they’ve got to, because they’ve all but ruined comic books with crossovers multiple titles for the same characters.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Iron Man Review on May 3rd, 2008

Best Superhero Accoutrement on April 25th, 2008

Lone Wolf & Cub on March 6th, 2006

Costumorama on June 22nd, 2006

Collectibles on December 17th, 2007

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

May 03

I realize that asking this question amounts to: ”Why are people bad?” or “Why is there evil in the world?” But still, along with my perfectly cheerful Iron Man viewing yesterday, I had a couple of bad experiences too that made me dwell on a darker side of life: Why are we so wasteful?

First, I went by Wal-Mart to pick up some groceries on the way home from the movie. I grabbed some eggs and, inspecting the carton, found one broken. I put it back and grabbed another carton, which was full of unbroken eggs. There was a stock guy standing there, and he asked me if the carton I’d put back had a broken egg in it. I told him it did, and he took it and put it on his cart, saying that their policy was to throw away the entire carton if it had a single broken egg in it. I thought about this “policy” for the rest of the day. There was a time when the stock guy would remove the broken eggs, replace them with good ones, and discard only the eggs that were broken. That keeps waste to a minimum. I realize that food in grocery stores goes bad and they throw it out; food goes bad in my own fridge and I throw it out. But this seems like wanton waste to me.

Also, there was a really big Iron Man cardboard display in the theater where I went to see the movie. I asked one girl who worked there if I could have it. She said, “Probably. We just throw them away when the movie’s over, or one of the managers takes them home.” She told me I should ask a manager. So I did, and his reply was, “No, we have to return those to the distributor. We’re not allowed to give them away.” He lied to me with a smile on his face. And what really gripes me about that is that the truth would have been just fine. Even if he’d said, “No, dude, I’ve got claim on that one. Sorry,” I would have been fine with it. The alternative is even worse, that they would rather destroy it than give it to a fan. I just wanted to put it on my office wall.

Waste is one of those things that really plagues me. There are too many daily examples to point out. I wish it was different.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Can Global Warming Result in Global Cooling? on April 7th, 2008

Gross Scientific Failure [Global Cooling] on May 1st, 2008

Gravity Wave on April 7th, 2008

Earth's Hum on April 17th, 2008

The Dawn of a New Age of Sail on April 8th, 2008

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags:

May 03

Iron Man told a great story, had plenty of plot, great acting, only a couple of moments of significant cheese…all the things that make a great movie. But, ultimately, I’ll remember it most for what it failed to do, for the dearth of Iron Man himself. It’s a problem a lot of movies have: how to tell the story, and still incorporate all the action the audience wants to see. I remember the first time I saw Beetlejuice, I thought the same thing: this could have been a good movie if there’d been more Beetlejuice. Same with the first Hulk movie. The list goes on and on of movies that were good–don’t get me wrong, I did like Iron Man–but didn’t quite quench the thirst for more. Maybe that’s the plan, to give audiences just enough to make them want more, to better guarantee the sequel and–the Holy Grail of Hollywood–the franchise. Iron Man will undoubtedly become a franchise. There’s way too much potential here for there not to be, and I believe everyone will love it. I did, I just wish there’d been more Iron Man in Iron Man. 

This, I hope, won’t be a problem in Iron Man Two. All the setup is done now, and the movie can start with ol’ Iron Head patrolling the skies above Stark Industries. Who’ll be the bad guy in the sequel? Who knows. Iron Man doesn’t have a very good rogues gallery. His arch enemy was Mandarin, which could be very cool if done well.

Here’s another little problem with the movie: They gave too much away in teasers. You can barely go through five minutes of film time before you see another moment you’ve already seen in the various teaser trailers on YouTube. The entire first fifteen minutes of the movie is summed up in teaser trailers. There is nothing new to learn by watching the movie. I think they could have sold the movie just fine with the one scene of Iron Man falling from the sky into a crater, and then ascending, menacingly, to fire repulsors at bad guys. End. Follow the Cloverfield example; simplicity really can work very well when done right.

Overall there were maybe five or six repulsor blasts in the entire movie. This is a problem. They added a very cool little pulsing sound effect to the repulsor blasts, but then barely used them the entire movie. Oh, and when it came time to fight the bad guy at the end…well, some things are best left unsaid, right?

Overall it was a great movie. My only gripe is very simple: I wanted a movie my 3-year old would sit through (once the DVD comes out). Unfortunately, there are only about ten total minutes of this film that my son will care about seeing. And those were my favorite moments, too. I wish the entire movie had been like those ten minutes. Will I watch it again? Will I buy the DVD? Hell yes. In BlueRay. Because those ten minutes I was just talking about? They freaking rock. And the rest ain’t bad at all.

Where does Iron Man fit into the pantheon of super hero movies? I’m still working on that list; in the meantime, go check out Iron Man, just don’t take your three-year old.

Iron Man Movie

If you liked that post, then try these...

Collectibles on December 17th, 2007

The Invincible Iron Man on November 26th, 2007

Lone Wolf & Cub on March 6th, 2006

Marvel Studios on May 6th, 2008

Costumorama on June 22nd, 2006

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , ,

May 01

I read somewhere that 75% of blog visitors bounce away from the site within the first 30 seconds of arrival. For me, that stat is higher (this graph is for the month of April):

April Stat Graph for Unabashed

Wish I knew why. But at the same time I have around 10% who stay for longer than 15 minutes. To those of you who fall into that category, and who keep coming back: thanks. I like you. Overall, traffic was down from March to April. March was a monster month for Unabashed, raking in almost 300 individual users per day (86% of whom bounced without even settling for a full minute). For April, it was down to 196 (but 513 page views, so somebody’s sticking around). No, I don’t know why, but then I can’t explain why I get the number of visitors I do, either. They just started trickling in, and slowly but surely became what they are now.

So, if I was the CEO of a corporation, I’d be chewing the asses off my sales staff, telling the company to get a handle on churn, and I’d be trying to come up with a new pricing scheme and marketing campaign to get the ship righted. But then I’d be making $12.8 million per year, too. But… I’m just me, tapping out 8.6 posts per week and I don’t have a marketing campaign or sales staff, and I think it’s safe to say that any sort of pricing scheme above $0.00 would drive churn up to right around 100%. But I do have churn. 85.6% in the red. Ah, well, thank God I have my day job.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Dugg and Stumbled Upon on May 8th, 2008

2007 - Year in Review on January 2nd, 2008

Modern-Day Mythica, Chapter Two: Joe on March 25th, 2008

Modern-Day Mythica, Chapter Three: Griffin on March 26th, 2008

Cherie Priest Interview on November 29th, 2007

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , ,

May 01

Iron Man release day is here! Tomorrow I’m going to see the movie. Review forthcoming.

Iron Man Movie

If you liked that post, then try these...

Grindhouse Downer on October 15th, 2007

Charlton Heston on April 7th, 2008

Marvel Studios on May 6th, 2008

Cloverfield on January 22nd, 2008

M.I.III on December 22nd, 2006

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , ,

May 01

**Spoiler Alert** 

Rebecca Romijn - MystiqueSomething I’ve been thinking about lately: SciFi movies, more of them, please? Oh, and try and make them better, k? Here’s an idea: Old Man’s War, by John Scalzi, a book that is utterly primed for adaptation, and I don’t even see much of a way for them to ruin it. Look at the Hollywood history of putting the wrong actors in roles; the list is as long as the list of movies themselves. I’ve commented before that Rachael Taylor was an utter flop as IT genius Maggie Madsen, as well as a host of others. I’ll add to the list Halle Berry; she’s just too damned pretty to be Storm. Rebecca Romijn, she of the amazing body, who was perfect as Mystique in the X-Men series, but was a total bust (no pun intended) in The Punisher. The problem is that often Hollywood casts people that are too pretty for roles in which obviously less-pretty people belong. Such is the case with Maggie Madsen, and the same is true for Romijn’s Joan in The Punisher. But the reason she was perfect for Mystique is also the reason she–or any overly-pretty actor–would be an ideal fit for OMW the Movie. In OMW Scalzi has already craftily eliminated the problem of the exceedingly-pretty, not-believable-as-a-person actor, because everyone recruited into the Colonial Military is given a new and improved, genetically enhanced body that, while it retains the donor’s DNA and general appearance, is made much more physically appealing. The point being, you could cast the hottest people in Hollywood for the roles in OMW, ugly them down for the first thirty minutes of the film, and then just paint them green and give them cat’s eyes.

I’ll add that, like most people, I’ve read OMW’s one-star reviews and, frankly, I don’t understand it. It’s a testament to the fact that people just don’t like the same material, no matter what. In my opinion, OMW is easily the best SF book of the past ten years (at least of the ones I’ve read. And that includes all of Charlie Stross’s books, which I love also, but which aren’t quite as good as OMW). I just don’t get it.

Anyway, here’s my suggestion for the casting of OMW: the Movie:

  • John Perry - Brad Pitt
  • Jane Sagan - Rebecca Romijn
  • Somebody else - Will Smith
  • Somebody else - Orlando Bloom
  • Somebody else - Charlize Theron
  • Somebody else - Clive Owen
  • Somebody else - Ken Watanabe

There, that ought to get them started.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Vacation on May 1st, 2006

Patrick O'Brian, Bloody Olde England on January 28th, 2008

Books I've read this year so far... on March 26th, 2007

VidLit on March 21st, 2007

The Big Blue on June 18th, 2006

written by Matt Mitchell \\ tags: , , , , , , , ,